Gender Differences in Cardiometabolic Risk Biomarkers and Their Clinical Interactions: A Cross-sectional Analysis
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Research
VOLUME: 4 ISSUE: 2
P: 90 - 102
August 2026

Gender Differences in Cardiometabolic Risk Biomarkers and Their Clinical Interactions: A Cross-sectional Analysis

Bull Cardiovasc Acad 2026;4(2):90-102
1. Çubuk Halil Şivgin Devlet Hastanesi, Ankara, Türkiye
2. Başkent Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Tıbbi Biyokimya Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye
3. İzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Çiğli Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kardiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Türkiye
4. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Konya Beyhekim Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Konya, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 19.08.2026
Accepted Date: 16.09.2026
Online Date: 25.09.2026
Publish Date: 25.09.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Objective

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with significant gender disparities in risk factor profiles and outcomes. Understanding gender-specific biomarker interactions is crucial for precision prevention strategies. This cross-sectional study investigated gender differences in cardiometabolic biomarkers and their interrelationships, with particular focus on uric acid as a potential integrative marker of metabolic dysregulation.

Material and Methods

 Clinical and laboratory data from 169 patients (82 males, 87 females) were analyzed. Parameters included demographic characteristics, lipid profile [low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglyceride, total cholesterol], hematological markers [hemoglobin (Hb), platelet (PLT), mean platelet volume], uric acid, fasting glucose, creatinine, and modification of diet in renal disease -estimated glomerular filtration rate. Gender comparisons utilized independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. Correlation analyses and principal component analysis (PCA) identified biomarker clustering patterns.

Results

 Males demonstrated significantly higher uric acid (5.72±1.48 vs. 4.38±1.20 mg/dL, p<0.001), Hb (15.0±1.7 vs. 13.1±1.6 g/dL, p<0.001), triglycerides (172.3±90.1 vs. 148.5±85.3 mg/dL, p<0.05), and smoking rates (58.5% vs. 20.7%, p<0.001). Females exhibited higher HDL (49.2±12.0 vs. 39.3±8.8 mg/dL, p<0.001) and PLT counts (276.8±71.5 vs. 233.2±64.8 ×103/µL, p<0.001). Uric acid positively correlated with LDL (r=+0.32, p<0.001), Hb (r=+0.29, p<0.001), and creatinine (r=+0.23, p<0.01), while inversely correlating with HDL (r=-0.25, p<0.01). PCA identified three distinct biomarker clusters: (1) lipid-uric acid- Hb axis, (2) renal-hematologic axis, and (3) inflammatory-thrombotic markers.

Conclusion

 Uric acid emerges as an integrative marker linking dyslipidemia, hematologic parameters, and renal function, with significant gender-specific patterns. These findings support sex-tailored approaches to cardiometabolic risk assessment and intervention.

Keywords:
Gender differences, cardiometabolic risk, uric acid, lipid profile, biomarker clustering, metabolic syndrome, precision prevention

References

1
World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Geneva: WHO; 2021.
2
Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al.; GBD-NHLBI-JACC Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases Writing Group. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982-3021. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(15):1958-1959.
3
Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al.; ESC National Cardiac Societies; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2022;43(42):4468.
4
Mauvais-Jarvis F, Bairey Merz N, Barnes PJ, Brinton RD, Carrero JJ, DeMeo DL, et al. Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. 2020;396(10250):565-582. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020;396(10252):668.
5
El Khoudary SR, Aggarwal B, Beckie TM, Hodis HN, Johnson AE, Langer RD, et al.; American Heart Association Prevention Science Committee of the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. Menopause transition and cardiovascular disease risk: implications for timing of early prevention: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142(25):e506-e532.
6
Aggarwal NR, Patel HN, Mehta LS, Sanghani RM, Lundberg GP, Lewis SJ, et al. Sex differences in ischemic heart disease: advances, obstacles, and next steps. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(2):e004437.
7
Chowdhury R, Warnakula S, Kunutsor S, Crowe F, Ward HA, Johnson L, et al. Association of dietary, circulating, and supplement fatty acids with coronary risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(6):398-406. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(9):658.
8
Palmisano BT, Zhu L, Eckel RH, Stafford JM. Sex differences in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Mol Metab. 2018;15:45-55.
9
Alcover S, Ramos-Regalado L, Girón G, Muñoz-García N, Vilahur G. HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides dynamics: essential players in metabolic syndrome. Antioxidants (Basel). 2025;14(4):434.
10
Chapman MJ, Ginsberg HN, Amarenco P, Andreotti F, Borén J, Catapano AL, et al.; European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and guidance for management. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(11):1345-1361.
11
Rashid S, Uffelman KD, Lewis GF. The mechanism of HDL lowering in hypertriglyceridemic, insulin-resistant states. J Diabetes Complications. 2002;16(1):24-28.
12
Borghi C, Agabiti-Rosei E, Johnson RJ, et al. Uric acid and cardiovascular risk: a comprehensive review. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;27:1-8.
13
Wakabayashi D, Kato S, Tanaka M, Yamakage H, Kato H, Kusakabe T, et al.; Japan Obesity Metabolic Syndrome Study (JOMS) Group. Novel pathological implications of serum uric acid with cardiovascular disease risk in obesity. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023;205:110919.
14
Chu SG, Becker RC, Berger PB, Bhatt DL, Eikelboom JW, Konkle B, et al. Mean platelet volume as a predictor of cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(1):148-156.
15
Zuccotti G, Agnelli PO, Labati L, Cordaro E, Braghieri D, Fiorina P, et al. Unveiling sex-specific cardiometabolic and adiposity risk profiles for precision prevention. Eur J Med Res. 2026;31:292.
16
Chen Z, Ding Z, Fu C, Yu C, Ma G. Correlation between serum uric acid and renal function in patients with stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes. J Clin Med Res. 2014;6(6):443-450.
17
Feig DI, Kang DH, Johnson RJ. Uric acid and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(17):1811-1821. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362(23):2235.
18
Johnson RJ, Kang DH, Feig D, Kivlighn S, Kanellis J, Watanabe S, et al. Is there a pathogenetic role for uric acid in hypertension and cardiovascular and renal disease? Hypertension. 2003;41(6):1183-1190.
19
Niskanen LK, Laaksonen DE, Nyyssönen K, Alfthan G, Lakka HM, Lakka TA, et al. Uric acid level as a risk factor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in middle-aged men: a prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(14):1546-1551.
20
Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Mikhailidis DP, Kitas GD. Mean platelet volume: a link between thrombosis and inflammation? Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17(1):47-58.
21
Barua RS, Ambrose JA. Mechanisms of coronary thrombosis in cigarette smoke exposure. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(7):1460-1467.
22
Kanbay M, Segal M, Afsar B, Kang DH, Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Johnson RJ. The role of uric acid in the pathogenesis of human cardiovascular disease. Heart. 2013;99(11):759-766.
23
Luo Q, Xia X, Li B, Lin Z, Yu X, Huang F. Serum uric acid and cardiovascular mortality in chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):18.
24
Sautin YY, Johnson RJ. Uric acid: the oxidant-antioxidant paradox. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2008;27(6):608-619.
25
Chen C, Lu Y, Qiu J, Xiong H, Zhou L, Wu T. Data-driven cluster analysis identifies three clinical phenotypes in hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2025;47(1):2588961.
26
Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
27
Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991;10(10):1635-1636.