Evaluation of Whole Blood Viscosity in Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
PDF

Original Research

Evaluation of Whole Blood Viscosity in Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Bull Cardiovasc Acad 2024;2(3):84-92 DOI: 10.4274/kvbulten.galenos.2025.85057
, , , , ,
PDF
Permissions

Abstract

Objective

In our study we aimed to evaluate the relationship between whole blood viscosity (WBV) and the complexity and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD), in patients diagnosed with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).

Material and Methods

Two hundred and five patients who were admitted with the diagnosis of NSTE-ACS between 01.01.2018-30.06.2019 and who underwent coronary angiography were analyzed retrospectively. WBV was calculated for both low shear rate (LSR at 0.5/s) and high shear rate (HSR at 208/s) through formulas using hematocrit (%) and total plasma protein concentration (g/L). The study population was divided into two groups according to SYNTAX as low (<23), moderate and high risk group (≥23). Moreover the study population divided into two groups according to Gensini score median values as <30 and ≥30.

Results

There was no statistically siginficant difference betweeen the two SYNTAX groups for both WBV_HSR (16.4±1.02 vs. 16.1±1.1, p=0.139) and WBV_LSR (44.2±21.09 vs. 48.35±22.62, p=0.155). Also there was no statistically significant difference between the two Gensini groups for both WBV_HSR (16.2±1.07 vs. 16.5±1.04, p=0.183) and WBV_LSR (41.2±21.9 vs. 45.1±21.4, p=0.210). As a result of multivariate regression analysis, diabetes mellitus (p=0.037) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p=0.002) founded as independent predictors for high SYNTAX score, while mean platelet volume mean platelet volume (p=0.039) and LVEF (p=0.033) founded as independent predictors for high Gensini score.

Conclusion

In patients admitted with the diagnosis of NSTE-ACS we found that the severity and complexity of CAD can not be predicted by WBV.

Keywords: Whole blood viscosity, Non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, SYNTAX score, Gensini score

References

1

Chatzizisis YS, Coskun AU, Joans M, Edelman ER, Feldman CL, Stone PH. Role of endothelial shear stress ın the natural history of coronary atherosklerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, celullar, and vascular behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(25):2379-2393.

2

Kim J, Chung H, Cho M, Lee BK, Karimi A, Shin S. The role of critical shear stress on acute coronary syndrome. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2013;55(1):101-109.

3

Cetin EH, Cetin MS, Canpolat U, Aydin S, Aras D, Topaloglu S, et al. Prognostic significance of whole blood viscosity estimated by de Simone’s formula in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Biomark Med. 2016;10(5):495-511.

4

Ozcan Cetin EH, Cetin MS, Çağlı K, Temizhan A, Özbay MB, Ediboglu E, et al. The association of estimated whole blood viscosity with hemodynamic parameters and prognosis in patients with heart failure. Biomark Med. 2019;13(2):69-82.

5

Resch KL, Ernst E, Matrai A, Paulsen HF. Fibrinojen and viscosity as risk factors for subsequent cardiovascular events in stroke survivors. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(5):371-375.

6

Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Jaffe AS, Apple FS, Galvani M, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2007;116:2634-2653.

7

Farooq V, Head SJ, Kappetein AP, Serruys PW. Widening clinical applications of the SYNTAX score. Heart. 2014;100(4):276-287.

8

Gensini GG, Kisco M. Coronary Arteriography. Am Heart J. 1975;407:91.

9

Palmerini T, Genereux P, Caixeta A, Cristea E, Lansky A, Mehran R, et al. Prognostic value of the SYNTAX score in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the ACUITY (acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(24):2389-2397.

10

Drakopoulou M, Toutouzas K, Stefanadi E, Tsiamis E, Tousoulis D, Stefanadis C. Association of inflammatory markers with angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2009;206(2):335-339.

11

de Simone G, Devereux RB, Chien S, Alderman MH, Atlas SA, Laragh JH. Relation of blood viscosity to demographic and physiologic variables and to cardiovascular risk factors in apparently normal adults. Circulation. 1990;81(1):107-117.

12

Dikmenoğlu N, Ciftçi B, Ileri E, Güven SF, Seringeç N, Aksoy Y, et al. Erythrocyte deformability, plasma viscosity and oxidative status in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep Med. 2006;7(3):255-261.

13

Sloop GD, Garber DW. The effects of low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein on blood viscosity correlate with their association with risk of atherosclerosis in humans. Clin Sci (Lond). 1997;92(5):473-479.

14

Lowe GD, Lee AJ, Rumley A, Price JF, Fowkes FG. Blood viscosity and risk of cardiovascular events: the Edinburgh Artery Study. Br J Haematol. 1997;96(1):168-173.

15

Forconi S, Gori T. The evolution of the meaning of blood hyperviscosity in cardiovascular physiopathology: should we reinterpret Poiseuille? Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2009;42(1):1-6.

16

Mayer GA. Blood viscosity in healthy subjects and patients with coronary heart disease. Can Med Assoc J. 1964;91(18):951-4.

17

Lowe GD, Drummond MM, Lorimer AR, Hutton I, Forbes CD, Prentice CR, et al. Relation between extent of coronary artery disease and blood viscosity. Br Med J. 1980;280(6215):673-674.

18

Junker R, Heinrich J, Ulbrich H, Schulte H, Schönfeld R, Köhler E, Assmann G. Relationship between plasma viscosity and the severity of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18(6):870-875.

19

Kuyumcu MS, Özbay MB. Whole blood viscosity as a Neglected Parameter May Predict Higher Coronary Atherosclerosis Burden in Patients with First Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome. 15th International Congress of Update in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Türkiye, 27 - 30 March 2019.

20

Tekin Tak B, Ekizler FA, Cay S, Kafes H, Cetin EHO, Ozeke O, et al. Relationship between apical thrombus formation and blood viscosity in acute anterior myocardial infarction patients. Biomark Med. 2020;14(3):201-210.

21

De Backer TL, De Buyzere M, Segers P, Carlier S, De Sutter J, Van de Wiele C, et al. The role of whole blood viscosity in premature coronary artery disease in women. Atherosclerosis. 2002;165(2):367-373.

22

Vosseler M, Beutel A, Schafer S, Muxel S, Jabs A, Forconi S, et al. Parameters of blood viscosity do not correalte with the extent of coronary and carotid atherosclerosis and with endothelial funciton in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2012;52(2-4):245-254.

23

Ehrly AM, Jung G. Circadian rhytm of human blood viscosity. Biorheology. 1973;10(4):577-583.

24

Seaman GVF, Engel R, Swank R, Hissen W. Circadian periodicity in some physicochemical parameters of circulating blood. Nature. 1965;207(999):833-835.

25

Koenig W, Sund M, Lowe GDO, Lee AJ, Resch KL, Tunstall-Pedoe H, et al. Geographical variations in plasma viscosity and realtion to coronary event rates. Lancet. 1994;344(8924):711-714.

26

Ekici B, Erkan AF, Alhan A, Sayın I, Aylı M, Töre HF. Is mean platelet volume associated with the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease? Kardiol Pol. 2013;71(8):832‐838.

27

Abalı G, Akpınar O, Söylemez N. Correlation of the coronary severity scores and mean platelet volume in diabetes mellitus. Adv Ther. 2014;31(1):140‐148.

28

De Luca G, Santagostino M, Secco GG, Cassetti E, Giuliani L, Franchi E, et al. Mean platelet volume and the extent of coronary artery disease: results from a large prospective study. Atherosclerosis. 2009;206(1):292‐297.

29

De Luca G, Verdoia M, Cassetti E, Schaffer A, Di Giovine G, Bertoni A, et al. Mean platelet volume is not associated with platelet reactivity and the extent of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013;24(6):619‐624.

30

Niccoli G, Giubilato S, Di Vito L, Leo A, Cosentino N, Pitocco D, et al. Severity of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with a first acute coronary event: a diabetes paradox. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(10):729-741.

31

Rana J.S, Dunning A, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, Budoff MJ, Cademartiri F, et al. Differences in prevalance, extent, severity and prognosis of coronary artery disease among patients with and without diabetes undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(8):1787-1794.

32

Wierzbowska-Drabik K, Picano E, Simiera M, Plewka M, Kręcki R, Radosław P, et al. Wall motion index, force, strain, and ejection fraction for the prediction of SYNTAX/GENSINI coronary scores by dobutamine stress echocardiography: head-to-head comparison of different indices. Kardiologia Polska. 2020;78.