Gender Differences in Cardiometabolic Risk Biomarkers and Their Clinical Interactions: A Cross-sectional Analysis
PDF

Original Research

Gender Differences in Cardiometabolic Risk Biomarkers and Their Clinical Interactions: A Cross-sectional Analysis

Bull Cardiovasc Acad 2026;4(2):90-102 DOI: 10.4274/kvbulten.galenos.2026.19484
, , , ,
PDF
Permissions

Abstract

Objective

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with significant gender disparities in risk factor profiles and outcomes. Understanding gender-specific biomarker interactions is crucial for precision prevention strategies. This cross-sectional study investigated gender differences in cardiometabolic biomarkers and their interrelationships, with particular focus on uric acid as a potential integrative marker of metabolic dysregulation.

Material and Methods

 Clinical and laboratory data from 169 patients (82 males, 87 females) were analyzed. Parameters included demographic characteristics, lipid profile [low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglyceride, total cholesterol], hematological markers [hemoglobin (Hb), platelet (PLT), mean platelet volume], uric acid, fasting glucose, creatinine, and modification of diet in renal disease -estimated glomerular filtration rate. Gender comparisons utilized independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. Correlation analyses and principal component analysis (PCA) identified biomarker clustering patterns.

Results

 Males demonstrated significantly higher uric acid (5.72±1.48 vs. 4.38±1.20 mg/dL, p<0.001), Hb (15.0±1.7 vs. 13.1±1.6 g/dL, p<0.001), triglycerides (172.3±90.1 vs. 148.5±85.3 mg/dL, p<0.05), and smoking rates (58.5% vs. 20.7%, p<0.001). Females exhibited higher HDL (49.2±12.0 vs. 39.3±8.8 mg/dL, p<0.001) and PLT counts (276.8±71.5 vs. 233.2±64.8 ×103/µL, p<0.001). Uric acid positively correlated with LDL (r=+0.32, p<0.001), Hb (r=+0.29, p<0.001), and creatinine (r=+0.23, p<0.01), while inversely correlating with HDL (r=-0.25, p<0.01). PCA identified three distinct biomarker clusters: (1) lipid-uric acid- Hb axis, (2) renal-hematologic axis, and (3) inflammatory-thrombotic markers.

Conclusion

 Uric acid emerges as an integrative marker linking dyslipidemia, hematologic parameters, and renal function, with significant gender-specific patterns. These findings support sex-tailored approaches to cardiometabolic risk assessment and intervention.

Keywords: Gender differences, cardiometabolic risk, uric acid, lipid profile, biomarker clustering, metabolic syndrome, precision prevention

References

1

World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Geneva: WHO; 2021.

2

Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al.; GBD-NHLBI-JACC Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases Writing Group. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982-3021. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(15):1958-1959.

3

Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al.; ESC National Cardiac Societies; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2022;43(42):4468.

4

Mauvais-Jarvis F, Bairey Merz N, Barnes PJ, Brinton RD, Carrero JJ, DeMeo DL, et al. Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. 2020;396(10250):565-582. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020;396(10252):668.

5

El Khoudary SR, Aggarwal B, Beckie TM, Hodis HN, Johnson AE, Langer RD, et al.; American Heart Association Prevention Science Committee of the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. Menopause transition and cardiovascular disease risk: implications for timing of early prevention: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142(25):e506-e532.

6

Aggarwal NR, Patel HN, Mehta LS, Sanghani RM, Lundberg GP, Lewis SJ, et al. Sex differences in ischemic heart disease: advances, obstacles, and next steps. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(2):e004437.

7

Chowdhury R, Warnakula S, Kunutsor S, Crowe F, Ward HA, Johnson L, et al. Association of dietary, circulating, and supplement fatty acids with coronary risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(6):398-406. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(9):658.

8

Palmisano BT, Zhu L, Eckel RH, Stafford JM. Sex differences in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Mol Metab. 2018;15:45-55.

9

Alcover S, Ramos-Regalado L, Girón G, Muñoz-García N, Vilahur G. HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides dynamics: essential players in metabolic syndrome. Antioxidants (Basel). 2025;14(4):434.

10

Chapman MJ, Ginsberg HN, Amarenco P, Andreotti F, Borén J, Catapano AL, et al.; European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and guidance for management. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(11):1345-1361.

11

Rashid S, Uffelman KD, Lewis GF. The mechanism of HDL lowering in hypertriglyceridemic, insulin-resistant states. J Diabetes Complications. 2002;16(1):24-28.

12

Borghi C, Agabiti-Rosei E, Johnson RJ, et al. Uric acid and cardiovascular risk: a comprehensive review. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;27:1-8.

13

Wakabayashi D, Kato S, Tanaka M, Yamakage H, Kato H, Kusakabe T, et al.; Japan Obesity Metabolic Syndrome Study (JOMS) Group. Novel pathological implications of serum uric acid with cardiovascular disease risk in obesity. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023;205:110919.

14

Chu SG, Becker RC, Berger PB, Bhatt DL, Eikelboom JW, Konkle B, et al. Mean platelet volume as a predictor of cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(1):148-156.

15

Zuccotti G, Agnelli PO, Labati L, Cordaro E, Braghieri D, Fiorina P, et al. Unveiling sex-specific cardiometabolic and adiposity risk profiles for precision prevention. Eur J Med Res. 2026;31:292.

16

Chen Z, Ding Z, Fu C, Yu C, Ma G. Correlation between serum uric acid and renal function in patients with stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes. J Clin Med Res. 2014;6(6):443-450.

17

Feig DI, Kang DH, Johnson RJ. Uric acid and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(17):1811-1821. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010;362(23):2235.

18

Johnson RJ, Kang DH, Feig D, Kivlighn S, Kanellis J, Watanabe S, et al. Is there a pathogenetic role for uric acid in hypertension and cardiovascular and renal disease? Hypertension. 2003;41(6):1183-1190.

19

Niskanen LK, Laaksonen DE, Nyyssönen K, Alfthan G, Lakka HM, Lakka TA, et al. Uric acid level as a risk factor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in middle-aged men: a prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(14):1546-1551.

20

Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Mikhailidis DP, Kitas GD. Mean platelet volume: a link between thrombosis and inflammation? Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17(1):47-58.

21

Barua RS, Ambrose JA. Mechanisms of coronary thrombosis in cigarette smoke exposure. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(7):1460-1467.

22

Kanbay M, Segal M, Afsar B, Kang DH, Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Johnson RJ. The role of uric acid in the pathogenesis of human cardiovascular disease. Heart. 2013;99(11):759-766.

23

Luo Q, Xia X, Li B, Lin Z, Yu X, Huang F. Serum uric acid and cardiovascular mortality in chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):18.

24

Sautin YY, Johnson RJ. Uric acid: the oxidant-antioxidant paradox. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2008;27(6):608-619.

25

Chen C, Lu Y, Qiu J, Xiong H, Zhou L, Wu T. Data-driven cluster analysis identifies three clinical phenotypes in hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2025;47(1):2588961.

26

Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

27

Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991;10(10):1635-1636.